<Back Print
$Account.OrganizationName
PRIVATE HEALTHCARE CENTRAL
March 8, 2007


-- TOP STORY: SHOULD APPA SUPPORT A HOSPITALIST PROGRAM?
-- LOCAL STORY: THE HOSPITAL COMPUTER THAT REPLACED THE ADMITTING PHYSICIAN
-- EDITORIAL: IS OUR PRIVATE PHYSICIAN INFRASTRUCTURE DETERIORATING?
-- MEMBER NEWS: EMPLOYMENT NEEDS



TOP STORY: SHOULD APPA SUPPORT A HOSPITALIST PROGRAM?

     For the moment, the prospect of a new hospitalist group brought in under contract by our hospital is remote. Both the CEO and the Medical Director have made it clear that this is not their intent. They realize that APPA and the rest of our physician community would not support this and such a group would have few if any patients to care for.
      Nonetheless, the debate about this issue has exposed trends in hospital care, which may necessitate a formal hospitalist program in the near future. Consider the following:
  • More of our primary care physicians are pulling back from hospital work. Some admit but refer all management to specialists whom they call in. Others refer to specialists and ask them to admit. A growing number sign out all hospital calls and coverage to our current pulmonologist-hospitalists.
  • More of our specialty physicians are pulling back from hospital work. Many are much busier and more productive in their offices, surgicenters and imaging centers. Hospital call and care is being turned over to junior colleagues or fellows in local training programs.
  • Some observers now complain that all of this too often results in inefficiently managed patients. Without someone assuming the ultimate decision-making authority and coordinating consultants’ recommendations, patients can languish in a hospital bed.
      The reasons for all this are familiar. Primary care physicians are narrowing their practices—away from complete patient responsibility to limited or even so-called micro practices. Reimbursements for hospital work are relatively poor compared to outpatient procedures and practice. The hassle factor is way up—from InterQual computer hassles to admit a patient to calls from overstressed nurses at 4 a.m.
      If these trends continue, pressure to further reduce length of stay may force our hospital to act. We may face internal dissension if enough primary physicians cease functioning as admitting physicians and place too much of a burden on specialists and our pulmonologist-hospitalists. As the largest organized group of physicians in our community, APPA should carefully consider how this issue affects our private healthcare culture. We should discuss further whether we should encourage our own internal solution before one is imposed upon us.


LOCAL STORY: THE HOSPITAL COMPUTER THAT REPLACED THE ADMITTING PHYSICIAN

      There was a time when a physician decided if a patient would benefit from hospitalization and was able to write hospital orders to accomplish that. Thanks to Medicare(CMS), NHIC, and a company called Lumetra, that is no longer the case. CMS rules for hospital admission and bed assignment are now based on the InterQual criteria.
      The computer containing the InterQual software sits in the E.R. The severity of illness (i.e. “chest pain with positive treponin") along with the intensity of service (i.e. your orders) are entered in the algorithm by the admitting nurse. In case you are wondering, the criteria for chest pain run 5 pages in printed form. The computer then determines if admission is judged appropriate and where the patient should be cared for. The patient’s past history and the physician’s clinical judgment count for little in this age of computerized decision-making. If the computer says “Admit to CDU” instead of CCU, you can argue with the admitting nurse or call the Medical Director.
      One wonders what our Medicare patients would think of all this. Do they even know that their hospital is completely controlled by CMS regulations and bureaucracy?


EDITORIAL: IS OUR PRIVATE PHYSICIAN INFRASTRUCTURE DETERIORATING?

      Private physicians, especially primary care physicians, are rapidly changing their manner of practice. The reasons are numerous:
  • Medicare reimbursements for ancillary procedures financially supporting office practice have been cut sharply in 2007 and will be cut further. Paltry increases in office visit services do not adequately compensate for these cuts.
  • PPO insurance reimbursements fall as Medicare rates fall. These contracts peg payments to a percentage of Medicare rates. Blue Shield now pays 60% of a Medicare allowable charge.
  • Our governor proposes a 2% tax on gross physician revenue. Imagine an oncology practice with hundreds of thousands of dollars in gross income from chemotherapy with a currently small profit margin. Net income to the oncologist could drop 30%.
  • Even more government limitation on physician business practice. 2007 Stark rules further restrict the manner and location of physician imaging services.
  • Practice overhead grows relentlessly. Southern California has the highest overhead in the country.
  • Practice growth is almost impossible. With our backs to the sea, our marketplace is limited. Recruitment of new physicians in order to grow is next to impossible because of our cost of living.
  • Caring for hospitalized patients has become a poor use of an office-based physician’s time. Reimbursements relative to time involved are low. The hassle factor outweighs the professional obligation for many. Fighting with an InterQual computer to get a patient admitted and taking phone calls from discharge planners and hospital administrators wanting a patient discharged becomes too much to take.
      How are physicians adapting? By making major changes in their manner of practice:
  • Accepting no new Medicare patients.
  • Limiting under 65 new patients to well patient care
  • Narrowing the scope of practice--micropractice.
  • Employing mid-level practitioners such as PAs and NPs to limit patient time commitment.
  • Increasing throughput--shorter visit times
  • Limiting office hassles—less telephone access.
  • Adding even more ancillaries—DEXA, ultrasound, stress testing.
  • Adding “access fees” for uncovered, preventive services.
  • Adding cash pay services—botox, laser and skin treatments product sales,
  • Doing med-legal work
  • Transfering hospital care to junior associates if in group practice.
  • Transfering hospital care to “hospitalists” if in solo practice.
  • Considering early retirement.

      How does all this affect our private healthcare infrastructure? Primarily in ways which do not benefit our sick patients.

  • Fewer physicians available to see new sick patients.
  • Less physician time available for sick patient care, more time spent on ancillary procedures and services.
  • Less time for interaction among primary physicians and consultants in the care of sick patients.
  • Less efficient hospital care by “hospitalists” who have less information about and no relationship with sick patients they admit.
  • Deterioration of our physician-patient relationships, loss of loyalty from our patient base, potential loss of our unique marketshare.
      Private physicians practice a relationship based profession. We know that there is no more powerful tool than the therapeutic relationship we have with each patient as a unique individual battling a disease. Our effectiveness as well as our professional happiness is in large measure determined by how well we maintain this unique bond.
     None of us can be truly successful in a relationship-based private practice alone. Without colleagues and consultants who practice as we do and a hospital environment that supports us, we face nothing but frustration. We need to recognize changes in our infrastructure as they occur, continue to discuss them, and evolve in ways that enhance our private healthcare culture instead of damaging it.

That is one man’s opinion. I look forward to yours.

Richard L. Taw M.D.


MEMBER NEWS: EMPLOYMENT NEEDS

      APPA would like to assist our members when they are in need of employees, or know of someone looking for work, please contact the office at (310) 453 -0169.
      Private Healthcare Central is a publication of the American Private Physicians Association. Direct comments or questions to Pamela Deloney, administrator for APPA.


Quick Links...
  • Our Website
  • HSA Insider
  • Consumers for Healthcare Choices
  • HSA Finders


  • Contact Information
    phone: (310) 453-0169

    Forward email

    This email was sent to info@privatemd.com, by info@privatemd.com
    Instant removal with SafeUnsubscribe™ | Privacy Policy.

    American Private Physicians Association | 2021 Santa Monica Boulevard | Suite 212 East | Santa Monica | CA | 90404